{"content":{"sharePage":{"page":0,"digests":[{"id":"51269300","dateCreated":"1330904312","smartDate":"Mar 4, 2012","userCreated":{"username":"Maddie_Whitmarsh","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/Maddie_Whitmarsh","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/pic\/1327467318\/Maddie_Whitmarsh-lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/peaceandwarpoetics.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/51269300"},"dateDigested":1532725445,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Section I Removed","description":"I also took this out. It seems repetetive and I don't really know if we need it, but I also didn't want to step on anybody's toes, so here it is.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<br \/>\nInterpretation of Lighthouse Adjectives:<br \/>\n<br \/>\nMarinetti really plays into this idea of &quot;destruction of syntax&quot;; he takes what we would normally see as far as syntax in the English language, the order of the nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs and mixes it up to where we, as readers have to approach the materials differently. He puts many different adjectives into a group of brackets, which normally would be more of a side note than anything important, and makes it so that we have to figure out what they mean. In fact, he's being conservative in his use of the lighthouse adjective, only in the way that he can put a ton of words once, and not have to repeat those order of words to explain what he's trying to say. It opens the readers mind to possibilites that nouns do not just have one adjective modifier, it has many.<br \/>\nIt seems that Marinetti is trying to connect the entire world together by using broad strokes of adjectives to describe a many things. As seen example A above he extends those lighthouse adjectives to everything in the world, all that he sees and experiences.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]},{"id":"51269152","dateCreated":"1330904018","smartDate":"Mar 4, 2012","userCreated":{"username":"Maddie_Whitmarsh","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/Maddie_Whitmarsh","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/pic\/1327467318\/Maddie_Whitmarsh-lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/peaceandwarpoetics.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/51269152"},"dateDigested":1532725446,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Chris' Specifications","description":"wanted to move these for formatting purposes.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<br \/>\nA good start here. The structure that seems to be developing is -<br \/>\n<br \/>\n- Summary (brief definition)<br \/>\n- L.A. in Manifesto<br \/>\n- L.A. in ZTT<br \/>\n- L.A. as an aspect of &quot;destruction of syntax&quot;<br \/>\n- Connection of &quot;destruction of syntax&quot; to &quot;words-in-freedom&quot; (parole in liberta)<br \/>\n<br \/>\nBe sure to discussion how the L.A.s are working in their respective placements.<br \/>\n<br \/>\nAre the images you've chosen the most appropriate? Seems to me the image of Apres la Marne might belong on the Words-in-Freedom page (under typographical freedom) ... want to offer it to that workgroup?<br \/>\n<br \/>\nNo one else w're reading talks about using &quot;lighthouse adjectives&quot; ... but are there other texts where words (adjectives or other parts of speech) work in a lighthouse-y way?<br \/>\n<br \/>\nC.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]}],"more":false},"comments":[]},"http":{"code":200,"status":"OK"},"redirectUrl":null,"javascript":null,"notices":{"warning":[],"error":[],"info":[],"success":[]}}